That was the byline on cnn.com yesterday. Uh, click. Come to find out there's this particle collider, and it could destroy the world. Seems it's rather large at 17 miles across and 330 feet below the surface. Seems it cost almost $10 billion dollars. And it seems it could destroy the world. Have you heard of the Large Hadron Collider?
Needless to say I've been reading up on strangelets, micro-black holes and every other wiki accessible theory applicable out of quantum mechanics. So what are the odds the world could get sucked into a black hole or turn into a lump of steaming space poo a la Vonnegut's Ice-Nine scenario? Well, there's a nonzero chance.
What exactly is a nonzero chance? 1 in 50 million. The odds of winning the lottery. But, uh, people win the lottery. Here's another breakdown of the odds.
Of course, in a brilliant piece in the NY Times on this, there's also a chance for Don Quixote to make a return. You have to love the Uncertainty Principle.
Aside: I'm reading the NY Times article last night and what does the first line encompass? A quote from the book I'm about to read that I quoted from yesterday. It's an obscure book, so referencing it is quite random. Coincidences like that... well... it's always a little fascinating.
4 comments:
Sad to say that the only good use for the NY Times these days is to pick up my dogs poop.
The location of this project lies in direct line to the magnetic distribution fault of the earth. The plan is not so much to be sucked into a black hole, which is infinitely small but possible, rather to re-pole the north-south axis with the attempt to reverse the earth's rotation. Sounds wierd? But it is possible
Re-pole the axis'? Why? Please do explain.
Reverse efects of Global Warming for one. Second, to provide direct revolutionary control in anticipation of asteriodal collisions. Do you think the recent Mars landing was only to find water?
Post a Comment